Ad by The Cutting Edge News

The Cutting Edge

Monday August 19 2019 reaching 1.4 million monthly
Ad by The Cutting Edge News

Mendoza Against the Deaf


Mendoza Eugenics Stalled as California Legislator Considers Deaf to be Defective Americans

June 21st 2010

History-Genocide - Verschuer-Twins-Height

California Assemblyman Tony Mendoza has been stalled in his effort to pass legislation the deaf community feels will launch a eugenic campaign against them. Although originally scheduled for brief testimony and a vote last Wednesday, June 16, 2010, an informal survey of Health Committee members by Mendoza's office determined he did not have the votes. Other Health Committee members, stung by accusations of a slide back to California's dark history of Nazi-style eugenics, have declared their unwillingness to vote for the measure in its present form.

California eugenics was a system of eliminating unwanted bloodlines of those who were deemed "social misfits" in the twisted pseudoscience. Those targeted included such groups as the poor, prostitutes, Asians, whites with brown hair, those needing glasses, the deaf and many others. The radical early twentieth century social engineering plan became entrenched decades before Hitler came to power. Hitler emulated the California state statutes in his own Nazi eugenic crusade. Ultimately, some 66,000 Americans under 27 state laws were forcibly sterilized for a variety of eugenic reasons, with about a third to a half of the victims in California. That state's legislature has already issued a formal apology for targeting groups for extinction.

Mendoza's eugenic bill, known as AB2072, admittedly seems innocuous enough at first blush, critics argue. AB2072 calls for all newborns to be screened for hearing problems; and if found to be deaf, their parents are to be given an "informative brochure" describing the options. The problem, complain large numbers of deaf people, is that the brochure is under the control of the well-financed cochlear implant industry, the audiology profession and various Alexander Graham Bell foundations--all of which are determined to see deaf culture, and its distinctive American Sign Language, disappear. Alexander Graham Bell was a pioneer of American eugenics. Cochlear implants are controversial medical devices that augment hearing and, in many ways, tend to do away with the need to communicate using American Sign Language.

For their part, the generation-to-generation deaf are passionately determined to keep their special identity which depends upon visual communication, including sign language. They have fought back with mass protests and letter writing campaigns, as well as STOP AB2072 Internet sites and t-shirts. The deaf community also brought in the historical expertise of Edwin Black, author of the award-winning eugenics book War Against the Weak, which chronicled the deep relationship between California eugenicists and the Third Reich.

Last week, Black lectured on eugenics in Sacramento to more than 500 members of the deaf community, including many who traveled from around the state to attend the event and thousands more who attended online. The presentation was cosponsored by a number of groups including the Jewish Federation and Gallaudet University as well as the Auto Channel, which video-streamed the lecture live worldwide with numerous sign language interpreters in attendance. Questions from deaf and hearing viewers were taken live from across the country and answered on the air. The historical ramifications of AB2072 as well as both the Nazi and California precedents of targeting the deaf were included in Black's presentation. Mendoza's legislation was a central theme of many questioners. Participants declared that Mendoza's name would go down in history as the man who nudged California back to its eugenic past and they predicted the same for any Committee members who voted with him.

The following day, June 16, 2010, at a mass rally was held by the deaf community on the steps of the California State Capitol with speakers, including Black, giving perspective on why AB2072 would endanger the existence of the generation-to-generation deaf. On the spot, one member of the Health Committee sent word down to the rally that her "yes" vote was being withdrawn as she learned of the state's prior involvement with anti-deaf and other Nazi-style eugenic measures. When deaf contingents, wearing bright yellow STOP AB2072 t-shirts, proceeded to Mendoza's office in the Capitol attempting to obtain a meeting with the lawmaker, they ran into a group of pro-AB2072 advocates filing out of his office. However, Mendoza refused to see the deaf constituents congregated at his door and outside in the hallway. Leaders of the deaf complained that Mendoza had declined to consult them when the bill was drafted, and had been continually rude and insulting whenever they would approach or ask a question.

"Mendoza Eugenics seems to be supported," explained Black, "by the medical industry that stands to profit from the cochlear implants buttressed by passionate, hearing parents of deaf children who have no connection to the traditional deaf community. These loving but distressed parents see deafness as an unexpected family tragedy. At the same time, the deaf are seen by Mendoza as defective Americans whose affliction requires American Sign Language. Mendoza believes neither should exist in the next generation of Californians. He thinks the deaf can be legislated away."

After first being rebuffed by Mendoza's office, a small group of the activist deaf were finally allowed in to speak to the Assemblyman's point man for the measure, legislative director Rene A. Bayardo. When briefed on the history of California eugenics and its relation to Nazi genocide, Bayardo seemed bewildered and confused, according to reports of those in the office. He seemed completely unaware of California's history of marriage prohibition and the forced sterilization of more than 20,000 persons deemed unfit. He did not seem aware of California's Senate Resolution 20 that apologized for the state's eugenic past and assured it would never again undertake such legislation.

Bayardo's disconnect was only compounded when Mendoza's office issued an email that audiologists are "doctors" and competent providers of medical advice. Audiologists, in truth, are "technicians" who, in large measure, screen for hearing problems; but they are not doctors, cannot diagnose or offer medical advice. The relevant medical doctors are ear, nose and throat specialists, also known as otolaryngologists. The fact that Mendoza sits on the Health Committee but did not know that audiologists are not trained or licensed to render medical opinions caused one observer to refer to Mendoza as "incompetent." Discussions among the deaf began about recalling him.

Nor was progress made when a deaf contingent met at a nearby hotel restaurant with advocates of the measure. One pro-AB2072 mother said her son's cochlear implants were so successful, "you can't even tell my son is deaf." That was taken as an offensive remark by the deaf adults who celebrate their status. During the get-together when an effort was made to explain California's eugenic past and its impact on deaf people, AB2072 advocates abruptly stopped the presentation, asserting they did not want to know details of the historical past and preferred "to negotiate." The deaf, however, were fundamentally unwilling to negotiate away their group's continuing existence, but said they would listen to suggestions for fixing the legislation.

Political observers familiar with the Health Committee process predicted the bill was dead for this session unless it could be revived before July 2, 2010. With the amendments and the stain of the legislation that was suggested, a vote seemed unlikely. Still some careful insiders suggested a vote could be scheduled at any moment. "Who would vote for such a measure?" asked Black, "It would only make themselves infamous as the Health Committee members who nudged California back to the slippery eugenic slope?"

Copyright © 2007-2019The Cutting Edge News About Us